Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (9365)	2/15/2012 1:27:41 PM
From: Bread Upon The Water	Respond to of 85487

Well, I could live with that. You guys would then own the result.

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (9365)	2/15/2012 2:12:12 PM
From: Bread Upon The Water	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 85487

PS. But I am hoping for is that one party controls one legislative body no matter who wins the Presidency. This way the only way forward will be to compromise and involve the best solutions of both sides. This is what I think would be best for the country as it would keep more of us looking for solutions rather than blame. Additionally, I think the only chance for the WH for the Republicans would be to nonminate Romney. The other candidates would not be able to attract enough the center to pout them over the top. Santorum especially I see suffering a loss of large proportions--which I don't want either--as I don't want the Democrats to feel they have a mandate either. IN other words--STALEMATE-- is what works best for the USA.