Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : QUANTUM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Z Analyzer who wrote (5542)	11/23/1997 2:45:00 AM
From: Alan Hume	Respond to of 9124

Hi Z Now I just KNEW that you would rise to the bait, as you are one of the main advocates of spinning off DLT. Some of what you write is certainly true, others I don't agree with. First of all, there is an old but valid expression "nothing ventured, nothing gained". Some of the competition have been making music on the same old guitar until their fingures bled, and now they are bleeding up to the elbows Shareholder Orientation The industry has a poor PE tradition, due to its very poor history of meeting earnings projections I believe. But where has Mr Hagerty's "share holder orientation" got him? WDC's PE is 7,14 even after their poor earnings report. QNTM is at 11,21. APM is even at 4,49!. I do agree with you that the DD industry is grossly undervalued, but the blame for this cannot, even in part, be attributed to MB. I believe that this will not change until QNTM looses the tag of being "just another DD manufacturer" MR Transition Ok it didn't go perfectly from the word go, neither did the Hubble telescope or the NASA space program, but it worked the second time, and was the right decision. High End Drives I believe the the entry into this business was the DEC aquisition, which was some 2 years ago. 2 years to achieve a turnaround is not much, and I believe that MB will either achieve it in the next year or cut his losses Head Business I don't know how long QNTM has been in the head biz, or how they even got into it. But MB correctly decided that it was not his core business and had the guts to get out of it. This as I see it was part of his strong trend away from vertical integration. Witness the MKE relationship for further proof of this. DLT an accident? will we ever know for sure? Becauce I see that most of MB's decisions were correct, Igive him the benefit of the doubt and call it farsightedness. Maybe DEC and DLT was a parallel of Bell Labs and the transistor, I sure hope so In general, I think that MB is one of QNTM's biggest assets. Sure there are areas of the business that need attention, and I see these problems being addressed. After all, is there a company without ANY problems??? Regards Alan

To: Z Analyzer who wrote (5542)	11/24/1997 1:01:00 PM
From: still learning	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9124

Good post, coupla quibbles: 1. QNTM has made huge hi-end investments and never made money: it may be too early to tell, maybe not. I'm willing to give it another year. 2. DLT was no accident -- they knew what they were buying. The accident was in what bad shape they got it and how long it took to turn around to major profitability. They STILL haven't branded it well or made it a "franchise" because while the tech is well respected, it has no QNTM name identification assoc. w/it. 3. Agreee completely. 4. Tough call, but I disagree. MR transition for WD will show up in 1998. It has shown up in their stock already. The MR transition is fueling the sell-off every bit as much as the hi-end problems. 5. As a QNTM bull, I'm not bying the bull**** about DLT=$250 shr (or fill in your own #). Fact is, few stocks ever trade at FMV, and aren't supposed to -- there has to be a discount for risk. Today there is risk everywhere -- including DLT, tho less so than elsewhere. If SEG is successful, if Sony is successful in tape, if DLT sales slow -- even slightly -- QNTM will show its DLT risk. That's why they are working hard to downplay DLT growth expect. for next year. No one wants to be dependent solely on a single product, business unit, or segment for their #s. One of QNTM's greatest strengths right now, ironicaly, has been their failure to establish a solid channel. When times turn bad, the channel demands that you dump inventory quickly. It stacks up there more quickly, and you must look out for hundreds of small or medium-sized partners. In OEM, espec. with JIT invent., there is less exposure to inventory -- QNTM was not concerned about Xmas because they knew that OEMs would need the drives immdiately and had thin inventory levels on their side. That assumption, of course could turn sour, but there is not nearly the risk as there is with channel panic -- "got to move a ton of drives quickly now, help me by cutting prices so I can afford to do so." I don't want to get into the CEO vision debate except to say that all three of these conmpanies are legitimate competitors, and don't kid yourself (golfer9). If you think QNTM and WD don't take shugart very sreiously and fear him daily, or that the same thing is tru around the table, you are flat out dreaming. Who will win or gain mkt share/stock value is anyone's guess. My guess is that QNTM has chosen wisely in its industry segments, in many of its financial and operational decisions, and has room to move into new areas like optical, portable and consumer. These are all going to be key areas. And all will requires some expertise in Desktop, Tape/Removable, Portable, High capacity.