Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (23159)	2/19/2012 3:37:32 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

... that the theories of war on religion are valid, doesn't seem productive. I don't see any way to disabuse them of it anyway. I think I understand why the entrenched are entrenched and I'm all but certain that there is no argument with the potential to make a difference. So I don't know that there's a downside. Every battle about a conservative religious imposition has been about whether an existing one will be allowed to stay in place, or whether it will be removed. Not before I was born. I understand that the feasible actions are at the margins. I'm not thinking about adding a "major new restriction," just reversing the favorable recent movement at the margins. I want a stop-loss at words, further movement preferably. Would like to gain, not lose momentum. compared to the current attempt to force contraception coverage You continue to frame it as less of a problem like that somehow makes it not a problem. I don't care that it's less of a problem. It's still a problem.