Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : A US National Health Care System? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (23186)	2/20/2012 7:57:28 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42652

That not paying for other people's activities is imposing rules on them. I think that your point is generally correct, that is, when the context is the validity of the mandate coverage of contraception, itself. Not paying for something is not the same as denying it. However, if everyone employed by someone other than your employer is having that activity paid for resulting in your cohort is being singled out for denial, then your employer is imposing its rules on you. If everyone else but you and your office mates got a free Ferrari because your employer found driving such needlessly fast cars wrong, I can't believe that you would not object. Sure, you could avoid it by going to work for some other employer to avoid the imposition of those rules, but it's still an imposition of your employer's rules.