SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (9904)2/20/2012 9:27:32 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Coal is much cheaper when you consider the costs of storage and deconstruction and remediation. And we could not build them fast enough and there is not enough uranium.

If you are OK wth coal i.e. no mercury or AGW, best to stock to coal.

And tell your kids not to eat too much fish. they have measured that one with great precision!



To: Bearcatbob who wrote (9904)2/21/2012 9:51:09 AM
From: sm1th2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
The whole approach of the loony left has been to drive the cost of nuclear power higher and higher and higher and higher and higher and higher and higher so that it will disappear.

Not just nuclear, all forms of electricity or any of the other necessities of modern civilization. Their real goal is massive depopulation, but of course they assume that they will be the survivors.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News