Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brendan2012 who wrote (36998)	11/23/1997 5:11:00 PM
From: AreWeThereYet	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Brendan, for a Zip drive, you won't notice significant different between a SCSI and EIDE versions, the SCSI may be little bit more efficient when ASPI is used in multitasking environment. The parallel version of zip drive is noticably slower because it failed to utilize the EPP port's 2MB bandwidth. The new Zip+ may solve this problem. So for a zip drive, it is technically incorrect to say the parallel port is the bottleneck when there are device which also use EPP but can achieve 1.5MB/s. aC