SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: slacker711 who wrote (126202)2/23/2012 10:33:55 PM
From: Keith Feral  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 213177
 
Apple cell phones are much more cost competitive than they were a year ago. Sure, they are getting higher subsidies, but I don't think that's something that influences somebody's decision to buy a $99 iPhone 4 vs a $99 Droid phone.

The nice thing about iPhones is they carry a strong residual value too. I traded in my wife's ATT iPhone 4 for $270 to get a $199 iPhone 4S from Sprint. It cost me probably $70 to break the ATT contract early, so I basically came out even on the trade. I paid $99 for 2 iPhone 4 models for the kids, and $199 for an iPhone 4S for myself. By trading in all my old cell phones to Best Buy, they gave me $200 for all my used phones, so I only paid $200 net for 4 Apple iPhones last year. At $50 a iPhone, it was a great deal.

With iPhone's tiered pricing from $0 to $199 in the US and $0 for 3 year contracts in China for the iPhone 4S, I don't think the post paid consumer can possibly detect a price advantage to buying other phones at this point. I hope that once the iPhone 5 rolls out, everything will shift down in the pricing lineup. Put the iPhone 5 at $199, the 16 GB iPhone 4S at $99, and let the 8 GB iPhone 4 replace the iPhone 3GS for free.

If QCOM is projecting 30% LTE chips by the end of the year, there probably is no doubt the iPhone 5 will launch this fall. That would help avoid any letdown in sales growth for Apple all the way through 2013.