Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: sheila rothstein who wrote (37010)	11/22/1997 9:42:00 PM
From: jwk	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 58324

>>What I want to know is: Who told you my investment strategies???...spank<< My cats. >>With all the publicity and great reviews at the Comdex show last week; after all digested in the weekend, I won't be surprised that IOM will up 1, may be 1-1/2, on Monday open....gilbert<< You may well be right. For a longer term effect though, I'm thinking that a reliable substantiation to the Naomai rumor (there, I've snuck in another mention of it!) and an announcement of 11 million Zips real soon, combined with a dawning realization on the Street of the bottom line enhancements from Clik! et al .... and Monday's opening will be of little consequence. Everybody loves to love a winner, and guess who has won the removeable storage/accessories war. The reason I try not to time trades is because I'm worse at it than Edloss. BUT, if we get a short squeeze/momentum player blow-off, I may try and step out near the top (hopefully, our cadre of faithful thread daytraders will guarantee us when that is) and re-enter on a pull back. No way I'd try to do the old dog tricks that FIDO performs in catching all the teeth in the sawtooth climb. I would like to catch THE BIG SPIKE, though. >>P.P.S. to Jack. Don't worry, you got to post number 37000 and that's all that counts. << Edloss, may I call you that? G Thanks for noticing. I was starting to think that I was only one who thinks that's a really big deal. I'm already working on my draft for grabbing #40,000. Seriously, great find on the Buz article. This company is definately creating a synergistic paradigm shift. (ouch, I hate it when my fingers make me type those kind of pharses) >> OT to Jack I tried that trading strategy yesterday. It didn't work.<< hmmmmm...... what type of bunnies do your cats have for buffet in Texas? That may have been your problem. Ya'll -- thanks for indulging in my bit of silliness this evening. I think we all realize that there is some serious money to be made in IOM in the near future, and we all have our different routes to riches based on our circumstances and our (or our spouse's) tolerence for risk.

To: sheila rothstein who wrote (37010)	11/22/1997 9:46:00 PM
From: Naggrachi	Respond to of 58324

SR--who said anything about censorship? All I ask that a level of profesionalism be maintained on this thread (kindda of like your posts,) and let fundementals take care of themselves. Who was it that posted earlier that as IOM got popular, the thread became trashier. I'm suggesting a way to avoid this situation this time around, by looking at the big picture. Keep in mind that it wasn't I who opened this can of worms, it was YIkes with his suggestion of another thread for traders. Since it's called free speech, I was voicing my opinon on his suggestion. That's all. For the record, I also enjoy Gary's posts. Especially those that kill any credibility Rocky Ried has using Rocky's own words as proof. I'm not suggesting that Gary should stop posting and hope he doesn't. Zead