Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: lorne who wrote (124711)	2/25/2012 1:14:29 AM
From: FJB	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224750

250000 likes as of this post. facebook.com

To: lorne who wrote (124711)	2/25/2012 7:44:06 AM
From: TideGlider	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224750

Worth watching for memory purposes but the Headline is exaggerated "uncovered"...although it is shocking if one hasn't heard him.

To: lorne who wrote (124711)	2/25/2012 10:07:21 AM
From: Farmboy	4 Recommendations Respond to of 224750

Yeah, old stuff really. None of it mattered in '08. It won't matter in 2012. There's a certain percentage of democrats who would vote for Farakhan, just as there is a bunch of conservatives who would vote for ... David Duke. I'm much more concerned about the ones who would vote for Obama because they think he's a good president, regardless of mounds of evidence contrary to that premise. That is, IMO, the group or segment of people we will never convince to vote for anyone else. That's the ones without common sense, without values, and without sufficient intelligence to actually think about things, before they go robot-like to the polls and mark the box by Obama's name. They're incapable of thinking for themselves, and just repeat the DNC talking points over and over and over, even in the face of proof positive that they are wrong. They're the ones who would never raise a finger to help this country.