SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (10707)2/28/2012 10:53:31 AM
From: mel221  Respond to of 85487
 
>> you just say that if Hansen is right, than reductions are useless.

That's right

Everywhere it seems that warming causes more warming. Lots of positive feedback factors.

The latest is methyl hydride bubbling from the Arctic. Warm ocean currents are causing a phase change and sequestered methane is entering the atmosphere. More methane in the atmosphere suggest more warming and so on.

Hansen's quote that we are at or past the tipping point in 2008 tells me now that a 10% reduction in CO2 emissions would be a pointless effort. And we all know even a 10% reduction is unachieveable.



To: TimF who wrote (10707)2/28/2012 12:16:05 PM
From: Bearcatbob  Respond to of 85487
 
Tim, CO2 is happening. The emissions are increasing. It is baked in the cake - period - end of story - in the cake. Hansen gives living illustration to the term loony left.

Bob