Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rod Currie who wrote (28147)	11/23/1997 12:27:00 AM
From: Brander	Respond to of 35569

Rod, I wasn't aware of this: " My main concern [among many<g>] was the provision for denying access [by shareholders] of any IPM 'document' without express voting by the Board of Directors." I have never heard of a provision like this. Is this normal for speculative mining companies? Does this excuse IPM legally from revealing material information to the shareholders and the market? If so, it is a very powerful provision, and would seem to give the IPM Board power to manipuliate the stock. It doesn't make sense. Brad

To: Rod Currie who wrote (28147)	11/23/1997 12:37:00 AM
From: marcos	Respond to of 35569

"If you wish to be further amused I suggest that you match up the educational claims from Lee Furlong's circulated resume against the details printed in IPM's 10K..." exchange2000.com exchange2000.com exchange2000.com I believe (but am not sure) that Aurum posted at around this time to this thread. The subject was discussed here, anyway, somewhere around the 11,000s, and the question was not (imho) adequately answered. This was one of the red flags I mentioned in my last post above.

To: Rod Currie who wrote (28147)	11/23/1997 2:48:00 AM
From: Bob Jagow	Respond to of 35569

Rod, So outside directors wasn't voted on? Perhaps "IPM management claimed...95%...voted for the amendments because they didn't have to produce those results either :-) "I suggest that you match up [Le's] educational claims...against the...10K...[which] must be requested from IPM"--or me :) Bob

To: Rod Currie who wrote (28147)	11/23/1997 9:46:00 AM
From: ddl	Respond to of 35569

And Rod, if I may add to that... Lee allowed himself or stated to JTaylor (Feb 10/97 Taylor report) that he was a "visiting professor" Applied Physics in Mining at the University of Newcastle (Australia). When infact according to Stephen F Cox, Head of Department of Geology, University of Newcastle (Australia), he states in an e-mail... Dear Denis I've made some enquiries concerning your questions. It appears that Mr Furlong did have an association with the Physics Department here,... he was a visiting consulting geologist.... It is unlikely he had any official title...If you need any further details, you could contact the now retired Prof of Physics... EOM