Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (66700)	2/28/2012 2:38:12 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 103300

If that's what he did, then I honestly don't see anything wrong with it... I'm confused, what's the problem with it? I believe the only reason Mitt is upset about it is because he didn't think of it first... enlighten me... TIA GZ

To: Honey_Bee who wrote (66700)	2/28/2012 2:59:03 PM
From: locogringo	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 103300

Yes, it does go two ways, but I still don't think it's right. And I'm ashamed of Santorum for doing this. Is it dirty for Romney to play 4 year old endorsements of him by Santorum? Is it wrong for Ron Paul to NEVER attack Romney once at any debate, but pile on to all the others? Was it wrong for Romney to say today that he won't light his hair on fire to beg and please the voters in the Conservative base by attacking Obama? Might as well just give us McCain again. libertariosusa.org Not an endorsement for anyone.................but let's watch it play out.............