SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Obama - Clinton Disaster -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (66716)2/28/2012 8:08:45 PM
From: John2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Here's what I perceive is logically wrong with the process of Democrats voting in Republican primaries and Republicans voting in Democratic primaries, my friend.

Let's assume that all 50 states allowed everyone to vote in both primaries. Let's also assume that both parities perfected strategies to sabotage the other party and force the nomination of the weakest candidate in each party. Then we would have a case of the weakest candidates from both parties competing in the general election. As a conservative, I confess to hypocritically liking the idea of being able to sabotage the Democraps, but I surely would not like being done to us. Today in Michigan, numerous Democraps attempted to do just that.

But, yes, if I were free to screw with the Demohack-it Party nomination by voting for a weakling, I damn sure would. Human nature. -g-



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (66716)2/28/2012 9:30:36 PM
From: Honey_Bee2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 103300
 
Of course, I will be all for getting as many democrats as possible to vote for our candidate after he is selected.

What I object to is the opportunity for democrats to vote in our primaries (or vice versa) just to cause mischief.

That's what I think is wrong.

I know that I am a minority of one on this here, but that is still how I feel.