Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: FuzzFace who wrote (37033)	11/23/1997 2:01:00 AM
From: Naggrachi	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 58324

Re: help! Thanks Edwin, that's exactly what I was refering to. techstocks.com Zead

To: FuzzFace who wrote (37033)	11/23/1997 8:56:00 AM
From: Cogito	Respond to of 58324

>>Of course the real irony is he accurately fortold IOM's bottom this year. He called 14, it actually went to 14 1/8.<< Edwin - Yes, Rocky did call the year's bottom of 14 way back in January. On the other hand, when the stock was near that bottom, he was calling for single digits. Just a couple of weeks ago, with the stock around 26 or 7, he predicted a re-test at 22. All this proves that if you make enough predictions, you can't help but be right one in a while. Still, with respect to IOM price predictions in particular, Rocky's record is spectacularly bad. - Allen