Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Zonagen (zona) - good buy? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Westergaard who wrote (882)	11/23/1997 10:03:00 AM
From: Dante Sinferno	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7041

Here's the link Westy refers to..... westergaard.com:8080/new.html In the article , mention is made that "Westergaard biotech maven Jay Abella" believes ZONA is overvalued. I may have to cover my short on THAT development. For those who haven't followed the Pluvia vs. Westergaard thread here on SI , Westy is upset that the balance of power has shifted away from types like him. This "visionary" has recently "discovered" SI and apparently , his cyber patrol is doing full text searches of SI for mention of his name. Rob

To: Westergaard who wrote (882)	11/23/1997 10:50:00 AM
From: BigKNY3	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7041

John: I respect the opinion that you placed on Westergaard Online. Congratulations for standing up for ethical practices. BigKNY3

To: Westergaard who wrote (882)	11/23/1997 10:19:00 PM
From: Anaxagoras	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7041

<<My Good Sir Your comment about Westergaard Online being a "hype site" hit a nerve. I've answered it in Monday's edition of Westergaard Daily Interpreter. >> Nay, My Good Sir, I am neither flattered by your attention nor particularly interested in your comments. I, along with many others on SI, was disgusted by your behavior in the case of Premier Laser (PLISA) with regard to the poster "Pluvia" and the ridiculous "bounty" you placed on his head; you made it perfectly clear by that episode that you are exploiting controversy in order to get eyeballs to your site while also attempting to intimidate those who choose to post criticisms of the companies that support you. I would encourage others as well to avoid pointing their browsers your way. Sorry, not interested. Anaxagoras