Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (474972)	3/3/2012 9:56:20 AM
From: DMaA	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 794309

One of the things that we are all missing is that she doesn't want lowly condoms. Where are the safer sex types. They need to give her a good lecture on this subject. Pregnancy isn't the worst possible outcome of her high frequency sex life and not using condoms makes it much more risky. It can cost much more then $3000 to treat some of the nasty STDs in circulation today.

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (474972)	3/3/2012 10:46:53 AM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Respond to of 794309

Why not both, to avoid pregnancy and avoid STDs? Did she say she wants only 1 type? < One of the things that we are all missing is that she doesn't want lowly condoms. Which would cost about a buck a piece. She wants a pharmaceutical contraceptive. In other words, she wants a contraceptive that doesn't protect against STDs. > I haven't read much of the case other than flicking through some posts here. Maybe 3 things to really be sure. One for him, a barrier for her, and pills too. But it takes two. So he could get his money out. Mqurice

To: Jorj X Mckie who wrote (474972)	3/3/2012 11:06:54 AM
From: MulhollandDrive	Respond to of 794309

Fluke decided to make her sexual activities a political issue. She also decided to announce to the world that she needs gold coated contraceptives.... and of course she wants others to pay for them....and excellent point about STD's and condoms..... i will say she is aptly named for her F$A status .......before F$A came into vogue, people also called them leechf&cks....so given her name, this seems wildly apropos here........ :) Difference Between a Fluke & a Leech X Rena Sherwood Difference Between a Fluke & a Leechthumbnail Leeches live in watery areas such as ponds. Flag this photo Both flukes and leeches are parasitic worms with powerful sucker mouths that latch onto the unfortunate host animal. There are, however, key differences between the fluke and the leech. * * 1. Where They Feed Most species of flukes live inside of the host's body, latching onto inner organs, while leeches latch onto the outside skin of the host. Micrographia.com, though, states that there are a few fluke species that can live on the outside of a host's body. Food * Flukes feed on bodily fluids and tissues of the organ they inhabit (so the lung fluke feeds on lungs, for example, and the liver fluke feeds on the liver). In contrast, leeches prefer to drink blood or eat decaying flesh. Shape * Flukes are usually flatter, smaller and more oval-shaped than leeches. Leeches resemble long, segmented slugs. Reproduction * Both leeches and flukes lay eggs. The eggs of leeches hatch into leech larvae, which act like small, adult leeches. But fluke larvae need to quickly get inside the body of a host--or go from one host to another--or it will die, according to the University of South Carolina School of Medicine. Dependence * Flukes need to constantly live inside or on the bodies of their hosts. Leeches spend most of their lives in water or swamps and only grab onto a host for a meal. ehow.com