To: Solon who wrote (21934 ) 3/5/2012 1:33:53 AM From: Greg or e 1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300 LOL! Of course you are PRO ABORTION You both defend and advocate for the practice as a basic and fundamental "RIGHT". "A perfect example of your lack of honesty--your fundamental deficit of character." No: but it's yet another example where you try to hide your position behind word games. Let's look at a couple of definitions for Pro Abortion: "pro-a·bor·tion (pr -bôr sh n) adj. Favoring or supporting legalized abortion. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/pro-abortion ....................................................................................... Pro-abortion - Definition Pro-abortion is the belief in the right to choose to terminate a fetus (fertilized embryo). Pro-abortion is also a movement, which fights for the rights of women to have a choice to end unwanted pregnancies. allaboutpopularissues.org ..................................................................................... World English Dictionary pro-a·bor·tion. proabortion (?pr???'b????n) — adj in favour of the medical provision of abortion
dictionary.reference.com . Pro-abortion From Conservapedia The pro-abortion (often labeled by liberals as "pro-choice " to avoid the uncomfortable use of the word abortion ) position in the abortion debate maintains that the decision to give birth is entirely a personal one for the mother. It is literally a "matter of choice" with no one else, including the father or child, having a say. A doctor may advise, but only in a limited capacity. He ought not try to influence the pregnant woman, even if she's just a young girl. Advocates justify this position with the materialistic idea that a human being does not exist until after his complete birth (see partial-birth abortion ). Advocates use the misleading term pro-choice to promote abortion ; by implying that it means pro-informed choice, when in fact some pro-choice supporters oppose informing women about the long-term medical harms of the operation. [Who says?] By using the term "choice", abortion opponents falsely portray the issue as part of the overall separation of church and state argument, with pro-life people opposing religious freedom and freedom of conscience . Pro-life people reply that no-one has the right to 'choose' to kill a human being. In 2008, Planned Parenthood performed nearly 135 abortions for every referral for adoption. [1] The more accurate terms for people and organizations who support taxpayer-funded abortion , promote abortion , or otherwise oppose fetal rights are pro-abortion . .............................................................................................. <<<Claiming that the forceful imposition of your groups morals on others is not binding because you think that you have "justified them by reason and Human interest" doesn't make them any less binding.>>> "Try to use your head for something other than decoration and deception…OK?? You're not a friggin DEER!" Thanks for confining your "discussion" to ad hominems. It suits you and it keeps the rest of us from getting confused! "...have been made legal by civilized parties in all times and places. Where they are dismissed it IS a moral breach, and the legal support and sanction of all moral breaches IS criminal and unscruplous." So you claim that "breaches" of universal rights are illegal and immoral but they are not binding???? YA RIGHT!!! Why don't you come back when you get your head straight.