Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (125498)	3/4/2012 10:36:37 PM
From: lorne	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224691

Say it ain't so, Joe: Boehner as president? Sheriff Arpaio's investigation opens can of worms in order of succession by Drew Zahn Sunday, March 04, 2012 wnd.com Video.... CAN YOU SAY, "PRESIDENT BOEHNER"? youtube.com What would happen if an investigation into Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president launched by “America’s toughest sheriff” – Joe Arpaio of Arizona’s Maricopa County – actually led to Obama being ousted from office? If the election ballots carrying Obama’s name were ruled null and void because of Obama’s ineligibility to be on them, some have speculated, Vice President Joe Biden wouldn’t be duly elected either, meaning the Constitution’s order of succession would make Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, president until the next election. But that’s an awfully big “if.” As WND reported, an investigative “Cold Case Posse” launched six months ago by Arpaio concluded there is probable cause that the document released by the White House last year as Obama’s birth certificate and alleged proof of eligibility is a computer-generated forgery. And even though the posse – which was comprised of former law-enforcement officers and lawyers with law-enforcement experience who interviewed dozens of witnesses and examined hundreds of documents – released its findings at a public news conference, Arpaio claims the press on hand were deaf to the evidence in a biased attempt to dismiss the posse’s conclusions. In a column published in the Arizona Republic, Arpaio says of the reporters on hand, “Their pre-determined desire to discredit me and my office would not even allow them to consider listening to what was presented in an unbiased manner.” “During our news conference, my investigators and I laid out a large array of technical information, demonstrations and evidence that no other law-enforcement agency in the country has even considered looking into,” Arpaio writes. “We have produced experts in the creation of electronic documents who will attest that the document in question is a forgery, evidence that the president’s Selective Service registration card is highly suspect and looked far different from any other card we examined from the same exact post office in the same exact month in which his was filed. “And we uncovered information from the National Archives that is mysteriously missing one week of flight information into Hawaii out of a 10-year span requested by my investigators,” he continues. “It just so happened to be the week of the president’s birth.” But even after laying out the facts the posse used to come to its conclusion, Arpaio writes, “Not one reporter ever asked about the evidence or the case itself.” Still, Arpaio says, he hopes the investigation will resurrect earnest discussion over the need for more thoroughly vetting presidential candidates. “Who in his right mind would disagree that would be a good thing?” he asks. Still, a team of video producers from Special Guests speculated what would happen in the White House and across the nation if Arpaio’s investigation actually revealed Obama’s candidacy to be “the biggest scandal in the history of the United States of America.”

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (125498)	3/5/2012 7:08:13 AM
From: TideGlider	3 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224691

He stole he first election from her on the sneak.

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (125498)	3/5/2012 12:08:08 PM
From: MJ	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224691

From what I have read it did not get as nasty as with Hillary. I'll never forget how Hilllary did not know what to do with Obama in the early debates. The possibility of the first white and black President being sold as the first black president. She should have attacked him immediately. But what do you do in 2007 with a candidate with the middle name of Hussein and is the bastard son of a Kenyan. And who was that Frank Marshall Davis guy? Some think he may have been his father. Stanley Ann Dunham could have used some condominiums.