SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Versatech (VITC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (230)11/23/1997 7:19:00 PM
From: Da Cat in Da Hat  Respond to of 435
 
That is not what I saw....let me check and get back...

The first error was not in the cash flow and obviously a typo.

The second was...and because of the third, probably a typo. It seemed as a result to merely be a math error.



To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (230)11/23/1997 7:42:00 PM
From: Da Cat in Da Hat  Respond to of 435
 
The error I saw was in the summation of Net Property and Equipment.
Because it was reconciled in Total Assets I guessed it was a reconcile error in a spreadsheet.

Looking at it from your angle it seems inventory grew but I do not know how to reconcile this pro or con. Like you, I am not an accountant. Are you saying that people who are supposed to be CPA's are wrong and are responsible for an error of over a half million dollars on cash flow of 2 million?



To: Sid Turtlman who wrote (230)11/23/1997 8:17:00 PM
From: Da Cat in Da Hat  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 435
 
I believe I have found the answer. This analysis really is for accountants and not for us.

Your errors that you note, the "Adding $301,416 instead of subtracting $354,508..."

The variance between adding $301,416 and subtracting $354,508 is $655,924.

If you look further down this is reconciled by the purchase of inventory using $655,924 worth of DHMG stock.

I'm outta here.