Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : XOMA. Bull or Bear? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aknahow who wrote (4853)	11/23/1997 12:09:00 PM
From: Robert K.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17367

George. I wasnt serious. I do know you would love to see a rec. from him. I also know you have been playing touchie/feelie with his associates to get a grasp where he might be headed. You might yet get him to notice. Indirectly though. But you do realize that If murphy could move the stock a buck, sturza might add some also. I concur.

To: aknahow who wrote (4853)	11/23/1997 6:25:00 PM
From: Tharos	Respond to of 17367

>>I think very highly of Sturza, and like the fact that he recomends shorts. I think it is a real mistake for some of the posters on other threads to just hate this guy. << George, With over 13,000 publically traded firms (includes pink sheets) no stock picker worth his salt can pick every stock. There simply is not enough money. I'll bet we will find Xoma missing from a lot of lists, point is to agree with you, just because your favorite stock is not on someone's list is not reason to cast judgement. You can only judge by performance of "picked" sellections. I had started to do this with a publication and began to notice things like G. Weiss ran 7 or 8 good picks out of 10. A Hursh fellow, forgot his first name, was 3 out of 10. This information made reading the publication much easier, I skipped the bad pickers.