SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spank who wrote (37059)11/23/1997 11:54:00 AM
From: Francis Muir  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Perhaps $17 after the split? When is the next court date?

FIDO



To: Spank who wrote (37059)11/23/1997 12:02:00 PM
From: KM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
Spank: Darrell said << but if certain factors of which you're aware play out, it could be at $17 instead before rising again. now there's encouragement for you. with strong factors the short term could be $37 to $41, without them?>> My interpretation of that is he's referring to Nomai and nothing else. It's kind of cryptic as Darrell tends to be.



To: Spank who wrote (37059)11/23/1997 12:09:00 PM
From: Tom Carroll  Respond to of 58324
 
RE: Darrell's post (speculating)

To all (not directly at you, Spank),

Another possibility is that Darrell is hinting
about the Sony drive that's been announced, rather
than about the Nomai suit. From what I've seen on
this thread, I think that is more of a wild card
than the Nomai issue is. If, and I emphasize that
I start this sentence with an if, their drive turns
out to be cheap, and fast, and high-capacity, and
backwards-compatible, AND ALSO if Sony markets
it well and produces it in quantity and without any
quality problems (this last being virtually a given
for any Sony product), then I suspect it could be
one of the only Zip challengers left with even a
ghost of a chance of unseating the Zip as the
unchallenged "standard" after the floppy. Sony
had better hurry, though.

This is just my informed speculation, of course, based
on close reading of this thread and on comparing all
the claims about "threats" to Iomega of one sort or
another against the past history of such things.
Take it or leave it.

And to Darrell, thanks for the hint. Given your
situation, I suspect you've gone very, very close
to the edge to send us that cryptic but helpful message.
You weren't a Kremlinologist, or the Oracle of Delphi,
in a prior life, were you? <g>

Just for the record, I'm not selling on this rumor.

Cheers, Tom (long IOM)