SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Any info about Iomega (IOM)? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KM who wrote (37065)11/23/1997 12:47:00 PM
From: boydude  Respond to of 58324
 
off topic: folks! Check out AZNT...a little company with a new sugar-substitute product that has no calories and is ten times sweeter than sugar.

Boydude



To: KM who wrote (37065)11/23/1997 12:50:00 PM
From: isdsms  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 58324
 
Yes he does BUT this morning's post is crap. His company is probably out of their position(reason he did not post much last week) and wants to get back in at lower levels. He knew he would panic some on this thread.



To: KM who wrote (37065)11/23/1997 1:02:00 PM
From: kjude  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 58324
 
im not sure the d post is negative ither its certainly illusive.
however, refering to gary indicates volume imho.
im sure if iom knew of such a downward pressure on the stock
they wouldnt have announced a 2-1 split. if the stock was split at
17 (as suggested) that would make it 8 1/2. naaaaaaaaaaaaa

the momentum is up on speculation w/ good reason.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News