Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (125809)	3/8/2012 12:49:20 PM
From: TideGlider	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224699

No, I don't huffpo...I get enough from Kenneth etc.

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (125809)	3/8/2012 12:53:26 PM
From: TideGlider	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224699

The law is used infrequently enough for Fed workers participating in election campaign activities. It won't get by the house. They must plan on using them much more frequently. It had always been a stay clear or go to jail, lose your job etc and should stay that way. I believe much of it is probably for the use of cogressional aides etc.

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (125809)	3/8/2012 10:01:46 PM
From: MJ	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224699

Yes, the Democrats are working to obliterate the Hatch Act. The Hatch is so simple yet the Dems want to expand it with all of the exceptions. Once the Dems get their foot in the door---------the Hatch Act won't be recognized. Like Obama-non-care it will be a 2000 page document. And, of course if this were to be passed now obama would be giving exceptions or rather a staff member would be robo signing the exceptions. Hawaii, Maryland and the libs in Virginia-------their names are all there.