Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (647306)	3/8/2012 10:10:15 PM
From: PROLIFE	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1580692

only takes One....... meanwhile: Income Inequality Myths Of Left Exposed Once Again Economy: The president's strategy this election year is to divide the supposedly battered 99% from the evil, super-rich 1% doing the battering. But reports of America's income inequality are greatly exaggerated. That financial "inequality" gets treated as a serious issue is proof of an epidemic of economic illiteracy, since the rich do the job-generating in our economy. Now, Manhattan Institute senior fellow Diana Furchtgott-Roth has just added some essential new analysis exposing class-warfare fallacies. Examining Labor Department data, "The Myth of Increasing Income Inequality," published this week, show "that inequality as measured by per-capita spending is no greater today than in it was in the 1980s." Among the neglected or ignored factors she addresses are the role food stamps, Medicaid and housing allowances play in the statistics; the increase in both high-income two-earner households and low-income one-person households; and more small businesses shifting from corporate to individual tax schedules since the 1986 tax reform. For instance, a higher percentage of low-income Americans — 26% in the poorest fifth of households and 31% in the second-lowest fifth — actually own their homes free and clear of mortgage debt than upper-income taxpayers. "In fact, in the top quintile, 18% of households own their homes debt-free, the smallest share of any quintile — a counterintuitive result," Furchtgott-Roth points out. One reason is that many nonworking elderly, with their meager retirement incomes but substantial assets like stocks and property, get lumped in with the "poor" households. Also categorized as poor are students and recent college graduates whose degrees ensure them a higher income a few years out. There are also fewer members of lower-income households, because the elderly are living longer, divorce has increased, and marriage takes place later than in previous decades. "Over the past 20 years, the size of households in the bottom quintile has declined by 5.6%" with the middle and top groups unchanged, she found. Among the population as a whole, "In 1960, 13% of households had just one person. By 2011, 28% of households, more than double the previous share, had one person." The huge increase in women working in recent decades, moreover, has meant t "the increased prevalence of two-earner couples and their higher household incomes at the top of the income scale." When these working women, many of them college-educated, keep on working after getting married, "they frequently become one household with higher earnings — and the measured distribution of income and wealth in society widens," according to Furchtgott-Roth. news.investors.com