Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (647434)	3/10/2012 12:30:09 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1570804

>>> PS: I think you just showed us how little you know about business development. You have, for years, shown us just how little YOU know about business development.

To: Alighieri who wrote (647434)	3/10/2012 12:32:01 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1570804

>> the other is its cost...i guess GM would nor or could not set the introductory units as enough of a loss leader to create real volume quickly. It is interesting that you, a "business development" expert (LOL), have just come to realize this. Perhaps GM thought it could convince Obama to double the taxpayer's portion of the purchase price to 15K.

To: Alighieri who wrote (647434)	3/10/2012 4:46:05 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570804

Al, > Is anyone attacking it to make a cheap political point? Nothing "cheap" about the tax incentives needed to keep that dog alive. You have completely ignored the fact that the Volt was indeed used as a political prop to argue for the bailout, and it continues to be used as a political prop by the Obama administration because of its so-called "green technology" status. > That doesn't surprise me considering that you worked on it. Cute. I also worked on the new Sandy Bridge server processor, now known as the Xeon E5. I suggest you short INTC based on the fact that I worked on their flagship server CPU. Tenchusatsu