SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: lorne who wrote (125978)3/10/2012 3:46:36 PM
From: MJ4 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 224748
 
Tancredo is correct-----Obama should be impeached.

In lieu of impeachment , is there another way to get him out legally.

How about, arresting him for crimes against the nation-------such as he appears to be engaged
in with his bringing in the UN on our soil as the Commander In Chief of the Military Forces. I looked carefully
at the faces of the military including Panetta for a sense of their not agreeing with Obama. I could find none----the only indication was their stoic military demeanor that would have made it reprehensible to disagree with the POTUS.

The UN is a Fraud on the American People

LIttle children of America gave dimes and quarters to the UN to help the starving children of the world in the 1940's and 1950's. Then there appeared a new building in New York City. Did the dimes and quarters ever reach the starving children of the world? I doubt it.

Now under Obama, America is subservient to his wishes and to the United Nations. For what purpose would obama bring the UN onto American soil------------for any reason that he deems is the answer. Will they give us back those dimes and quarters with interest?

We now know that the UN was not formed to feed the starving children of the world--------America was deceived.

Now we have the great deceiver of all times ready to bring the UN into America militarily????

Obama has already waged war abroad-----------is America next? Why else would Obama want to bring UN troops into America?



To: lorne who wrote (125978)3/11/2012 5:07:48 PM
From: chartseer4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224748
 
This is the new policy of leading by following. panetta is saying they cannot bomb syria unless that are following nato to do so. That is how they led the bombing in libya and that set our new policy. Our armed forces are now pawns of europe via nato. What ever is best for nato interest. nato's interest now superceed our interest. it is called muslim indoneasain citizen brilliant barry soetoro' s military policy of leading by following. He told you as much.