SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/11/2012 10:03:04 AM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
That reminds me of you sitting in church and ignoring the attack on gays for the sake of :unity". However , that is not the case here. You shouldn't attack black churches Kenneth It doesn't help your cause.

To: TideGlider who wrote (26864)
4/28/2008 11:18:46 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps Read Replies (1) of 126049
TG, you should stop attacking the black church. It doesn't help your cause.


Message 24540047



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/11/2012 10:10:53 AM
From: locogringo6 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224755
 
Your SILENCE about TEA PARTY DEATH SQUADS means that you agree with Paul V about them, and probably helped him fabricate such silly folly.

It is a logical conclusion by your silence for 5 months in not correcting him.

Why did you help him create such a disgusting LIE?



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/11/2012 10:14:20 AM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
Today's numbers show Romney at 48%, Obama at 42%. That matches the largest lead Romney has ever enjoyed over the president. Matchup results are updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/11/2012 10:17:52 AM
From: locogringo3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
Why is Obama so stone silent about the TEA PARTY DEATH SQUADS?

His silence must mean that he agrees with THUG Paul V.

There is no other conclusion possible, otherwise he would have corrected the phony info.

(brought to you this morning via kenny_logic)



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/11/2012 11:50:20 AM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224755
 
David Vickers named new interim sheriff in Lincoln County
[iframe style="WIDTH: 630px; HEIGHT: 42px; OVERFLOW: hidden" src="http://www.facebook.com/plugins/like.php?href=http://www.wowktv.com/story/17066215/interim-sheriff-named-in-lincoln-county&layout=after&show_faces=false&width=630&height=42&action=recommend&colorscheme=light" frameBorder=0 allowTransparency scrolling=no][/iframe]
Posted: Mar 02, 2012 1:43 PM ESTUpdated: Mar 09, 2012 1:44 PM EST

By David Iversen, Reporter - email








HAMLIN - Lincoln County Commissioners voted unanimously Friday to elect David Vickers as interim sheriff.

Vickers is a former employee of the Lincoln County Schools.

He can take over only when current sheriff Jerry Bowman resigns. Bowman and County Clerk Donald Whitten agreed to plead guilty to federal fraud charges stemming from the 2010 Democratic primary election.

A hearing is scheduled in Charleston for March 7 for Bowman and former county clerk Donald Whitten to enter their plea.

Jerry Alford was chosen to be Bowman's replacement, but he resigned Feb. 23 citing a conflict of interest.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/11/2012 11:56:39 AM
From: lorne3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224755
 
kenny ...You really have no idea how really foolish you look now...I love it...carry on. :-)



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/11/2012 12:23:08 PM
From: lorne5 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
'All American Muslim' show 'bombs'
Learning Channel: Pro-Islam program has lack of interest
Sunday, March 11, 2012
wnd.com

The Learning Channel has canceled its “All American Muslim” program, which was condemned by conservative groups for providing a skewed look at Islam in America, but it apparently wasn’t dropped because of any controversy.

It was just that few wanted to watch.

That’s according to the Atlantic Wire, which said the program launched with 1.7 million viewers but within weeks had plunged to 900,000.

According to the Detroit Free Press, cast members said they were told the ratings were too poor for the program to continue.

The show looked at five Dearborn, Mich., families of Muslims going about their every day lives. Characters included a police officer and a football player.

“Having the opportunity to be a part of such a groundbreaking series with TLC has been extraordinary,” cast member Suehaila Amen told the newspaper. “Our show helped to pave the way for the moderate Muslim voice to be heard in this nation.”

It was a Florida organization that launched a campaign last year to criticize the program, alleging it sanitized Islam.

Pamela Geller of Atlas Shrugs, earlier told WND the protest agains “All-American Muslim” by the Florida Family Association and the home improvement store Lowe’s was “a matter of standing up for the freedom of Americans.”

“Apparently, now the Islamic supremacists in the U.S. are so emboldened that they don’t hesitate to force U.S. companies to advertise where they don’t wish to, and to mount thuggish attacks against freedom fighters. This must not stand,” she said.

Get your autographed copy of Pamela Geller’s “Stop the Islamization of America” directly from WND.

“The fact is that the show specifically situates itself as a response to ‘Islamophobia’ – this was clear from the opening moments of the first show. But it is severely misleading, because it doesn’t deal with the kind of Muslims who would ever have caused anyone any concern in the first place. And I have been saying that since the show premiered,” she said.

When the program launched, the Florida Family Association lobbied to have advertisers abandon it. Among those that responded was Lowe’s.

The FFA said the show was nothing more than “propaganda that riskily hides the Islamic agenda’s clear and present danger to American liberties and traditional values.”

Jerry Newcombe, Truth in Action Ministries’ senior producer and analyst, said the major problem with the program was that it was not going to show the reality of “pure Islam.”

“It’s a free country. Muslims are free to practice their religion here (thanks to Christianity, ultimately). What is sad, though, is that the truth about the goals of radical Islam are hidden from many Americans through programs like the one on TLC. Islam wants to take over the world. If they have to use force, they’ll do that. But otherwise, they’ll do it by what Robert Spencer calls ‘stealth jihad,’” Newcombe said.

A line from one of the first two episodes illustrates what both Geller and Newcombe are describing, when one of Muslim women says in a panel discussion, “We live our lives just like anyone else.”

That perception is one of the reasons why Jihad Watch publisher and Executive Director Robert Spencer shared the concerns expressed by Geller and Newcombe.

Spencer said the program was attempting to produce a neutral view of Islam.

“The show apparently is trying to show that Muslims go to clubs, like to have fun, etc. But this doesn’t really establish anything,” Spencer said.

“The problem people have with Islam is its teachings of violence against and the subjugation of unbelievers. The problem is not with every Muslim person. It is with the supremacist ideology and the fervent believers in those noxious doctrines of warfare and subjugation,” he said.

Lowe’s later apologized for having “managed to make some people very unhappy,” but said, “Individuals and groups have strong political and societal views on this topic, and this program became a lightning rod for many of those views. As a result we did pull our advertising on this program.”



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/11/2012 12:42:09 PM
From: grusum5 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
I can only assume you approve of Lorne's crazy posts. That is a reflection on you.

i can only assume you approve of obama's skyrocketing electricity rates. that is a reflection on you.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/11/2012 1:52:30 PM
From: lorne1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224755
 
5. Samantha Power -- Senior Director, Multilateral Affairs, National Security Council. Ms. Power, a professor of public policy at Harvard [who is married to President Obama's Leftist fringe academic Cass Sunstein, the Administrator of the White House Office of Administration and Regulatory Affairs] was only seemingly thrown under the Obama campaign bus for referring to Hillary Clinton as "a monster" during the 2008 Democrat primary. In 2009 President Obama, tapped her to occupy her senior White House foreign policy position.


Ms. Power, a "fierce critic of Israel,... was indisputably Barack Obama's closest foreign policy adviser during the campaign. They go back years." Ms. Power is a notorious acolyte of appeasement-challenged, Neville-Chamberlain-clone Zbigniew Brzezinski (former President Jimmy Carter's National Security Adviser) who recently stated that the U.S. should shoot down any Israeli planes which, out of self-preservation, might fly through Iraqi air space to destroy Iran's developing nuclear facilities. Ms. Power agrees with the Charles-Freeman-published Walt-Mearsheimer-essay school of thought that America is run and being destroyed by a cabal of Jews. Power promotes the policies of disgraced anti-Semitic, Israeliphobic, pro-PLO, pro-Syria, Obama adviser Robert Malley who advocated not merely talking with Hamas, but funding the terrorist organization because he feels their policies and governance mirror that of Israel. The Obama Administration cut visible ties with Malley shortly after the election.


Power, who stridently criticized the invasion and "occupation" of Iraq, repeatedly calling for the removal of American forces from that nation, curiously advocates that America send armed military forces, "a mammoth protection force" and an "external intervention", to impose a settlement between Israel and the Palestinians. While giving the PLO, Fatah, Hamas and other obviously terrorist Arab state organizations a pass, Ms. Power views Israel, the only democratic and non-totalitarian, nation in the Middle East, as guilty of war crimes. She favors slashing, if not eliminating, United States aid to Israel - which is surrounded by several hundred million Muslims who daily pray for its total annihilation - and, apparently, giving the money to the Palestinians instead.


Ms. Power, and virtually all of her truth-through-force ilk ignore the fact that on the day Israel gained independence it was immediately attacked by the surrounding Arab neighbors who erroneously believed they could destroy the nascent country in a matter of hours. "Palestinians" (there is no such country, nor has there been since Biblical times) who now form the "Palestinian problem" were not forced to leave Israel but instead chose to do so because Israel became a Jewish state. Hundreds of thousands of non-Jewish Arabs remained and now form a large core group of Israeli citizenry. The approximately 750,000 "Palestinians" who left, now number approximately 4,000,000. They constitute a "problem" because of all the Arab countries only Jordan has allowed them to become a part of its society. The other Arab countries bordering Israel keep the "Palestinians" in enormous desert internment camps. And they have done so to their Arab brethren for 60 years. Ms. Power and her comrades exquisitely fail to note that Jews were forced to leave Arab countries and relocate to the newly-formed Israeli state.


Like her pro-Arab "realist" co-religionists Charles Freeman, Robert Malley, Zbigniew Brzezinsk, billionaire George Soros (an influential Obama supporter), and others of their stripe, Powers opposes the "Israel lobby." She, as they, adamantly rejects the participation of American supporters of Israel, including Christians, in foreign policy discussions of the Middle East.


For all Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's public visibility, it may not be much of a conjecture that her job has been outsourced to the alpha female who once referred to Mrs. Clinton as a "monster." [5]

americanthinker.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/11/2012 1:53:42 PM
From: lorne3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
10. Cass Sunstein -- Administrator of the White House Office of Administration and Regulatory Affairs. He is a Harvard Law School professor and newly-minted husband of President Obama's Senior Director, Multilateral Affairs, National Security Council, the Israel-phobic Samantha Power (one of several husband-wife teams in the Obama White House). Mr. Sunstein's belief structure could understandably be called "Leftist kook" or "fringe" if not downright lunatic. Herewith:

In a 2007 speech at Harvard, Sunstein called for banning all hunting in the United States. All. Everywhere.

He actually put in writing, in his 2004 book, Animals that, "Animals should be permitted to bring [law] suit, with human beings as their representatives...."

"[T]here should be extensive regulation of the use of animals in entertainment, in scientific experiments, and in agriculture."

Mr. Sunstein, who openly argues for bringing socialism to the U.S. and even lends support to communism, wrote, "The absence of a European-style social welfare state is certainly connected with the widespread perception among the white majority that the relevant programs would disproportionately benefit African Americans (and more recently Hispanics)..."


"[A]lmost all gun control legislation is constitutionally fine. And if the Court is right, then fundamentalism does not justify the view that the Second Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms."

Were Mr. Sunstein to succeed as President Obama's head regulator of all things American, what might happen to those millions of hunting rifles and shotguns he doesn't want gathering dust in your cabinet?

Mr. Sunstein is a reputed "1st Amendment scholar." Having attended law school myself and actually practiced law for a quarter century rather than retreat to the head-swelling-brain-shrinking environs of academia, I can assure you that if he is, America is in very deep trouble. President Obama has made clear his White House Masterregulator is intended to regulate virtually every aspect of American's lives - including the environment, healthcare, finance, and the economy - regardless of your feelings about such matters much less your freedom and liberty. Sunstein has argued in his prolific literary works (one bookstore tour de force was a whopping 84 pages) that the Internet is anti-democratic because of the way users can filter out information of their own choosing. He went on to assert: [10]

A system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government... Democratic efforts to reduce the resulting problems ought not be rejected in freedom's name.

As WorldNetDaily noted:

"It's hard to imagine President Obama nominating a more dangerous candidate for regulatory czar than Cass Sunstein....Not only is Sunstein an animal-rights radical, but he also seems to have a serious problem with our First Amendment rights. Sunstein has advocated everything from regulating the content of personal e-mail communications, to forcing nonprofit groups to publish information on their websites that is counter to their beliefs and mission.... If it were up to Obama and Sunstein, everything we read online - right down to our personal e-mail communications - would have to be inspected and approved by the federal government."

americanthinker.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/11/2012 2:00:56 PM
From: TideGlider6 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
Incredible Scientific discovery noted by Brumar:

Science identifies new type of parasitic fluke:

The Democrats’ birth control games add another parasite to the lexicon

Blood Fluke: Parasitic trematode flatworm found primarily in Southeast Asia, North Africa, and other tropical areas. The blood fluke lives primarily in the tiny blood vessels of the intestines. People infected with blood flukes become weakened and can die either as a direct result of the blood fluke or because it renders them incapable of fighting against other endemic diseases.



Liver Fluke: Parasitic trematode flatworm that infects the livers of a variety of animals, including humans. Another name for a liver fluke infestation is “rot.” Liver fluke infestation causes abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, weakness and, eventually, liver cirrhosis, with all that cirrhosis entails.



Lung Fluke: Parasitic trematode flatworm that infects human lungs. In the lungs, it causes causes chronic bronchitis and may result in coughing up blood. If it migrates to the spine, it can cause paralysis, and if it migrates to the heart or the brain, death results.



Sandra Fluke: Parasitic leftist agent that infects educational institutions and the body politic. Operates by demanding large financial subsidies for personal behaviors that provide no return benefit to the educational institutions or the state. Organisms that sustain serious infections by these leftist parasites routinely suffer complete system failures, evidenced by political bankruptcy, rioting in the streets, and potential societal collapse.



http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2012/03/10/the-democrats-birth-control-games-add-another-parasite-to-the-lexicon/



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/12/2012 9:01:25 AM
From: locogringo4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224755
 
kenny, you can come back without being embarrassed and totally humiliated.

We're used to you making such stupid remarks, so there is no point in hiding.

HTH..............



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/12/2012 10:10:39 AM
From: Ann Corrigan5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224755
 
Dems ignorant of Constitution - Panetta says they'd first seek international "permission" to go to war and then "inform" Congress what the Democrat POTUS will do. youtube.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (126049)3/12/2012 2:14:13 PM
From: lorne2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224755
 
ken...You IMO. need to read this and make an effort to understand.

Here is a quote from second last paragraph...

...."During that time, according to Tuskegee Institute, 4,730 lynchings took place: 3,437 blacks and 1,293 whites (mostly Republicans) (BlackYellowdogs.com)."....

Times have changed
Exclusive: Ben Kinchlow recalls pivotal lesson on racism he learned as a child
by Ben Kinchlow
Monday, March 12, 2012
wnd.com

The brouhaha that has arisen over the “name-calling” episode involving Rush Limbaugh, as well as the charge that a chant of “USA! USA!” at a high-school basketball game in San Antonio, Texas (where I went to school), is racist, brought to mind a very specific incident. I remember it clearly.

I came home, parked my bike carefully (You took care of stuff back then. It was hard to come by.) and ran into the kitchen. “Hi, Mama!” I made a sandwich, sat down (“Ben, say grace”), prayed over it and took a bite.

Between bites, I asked Mama a question: “Mama, what’s a “nigger”? This was the first time I had been called that. (Unlike today, especially among rap and hip-hop artists, we didn’t use that terminology among ourselves.) She looked over at me with no change of attitude and said, “Don’t talk with your mouth full. Why?”

I replied, “Somebody called me that on the way home.”

Now, Mama had options: 1) She could have dropped everything, broke down, began to weep and moan, “Oh, they called my baby a nigger.” Then, for the future I would have known how to respond; I should immediately begin to feel sorry for myself. Poor me! Black folks are objects of pity. 2) She could have slammed her dishes down, grabbed me by the hand, screaming, “What?! Who said that?! Come on, we’re going to see about THIS!” Then I would have known, “Call me that and you have a fight on your hands!” But Mama chose a third option. “Do you know what that means, Ben?” “No, Ma’am,” I dutifully replied. “Well,” she said, “go look it up in the dictionary.”

Now there were two things we never did in our house, and both of them were argue with Mama. Mama, who taught school, was a teacher in the truest sense of the word. (She also kept a dictionary in the house.) So, I took another bite of sandwich and went to look it up. “Nigger: person of any race or origin regarded as contemptible, inferior, ignorant, stingy, miserly, tight, grudging; a victim; a person who is economically, politically, or socially disenfranchised.” I read it a couple of times (I had to look up a couple of the adjectives) and then went back to finishing my sandwich.

“Did you find it?” asked Mama

“Yes, Ma’am,” I replied.

“Well?” she asked.

“I ain’t one of them,” I declared.

She stared at me, “Excuse me, what did you just say?” “I ain’t … I’m not any of those things.” And that was the end of that.

From that moment on, that word had no more meaning for me than Martian. What Mama was saying to me by her actions was: You are who you think you are, not who someone else says you are, and you are only responsible for your own ignorance, not others.’ Her response to that incident could have – from that moment on – had a major negative influence in establishing who I was.

Today, the “race card” has become an integral part of the American political lexicon. Racist and racism are often thrown about with (or without) the slightest justification or provocation. Anyone who may object to almost anything having to do with civil liberties is immediately linked to civil rights and, by extension, the racism of a bygone era. With all due respect, and at the risk of offending many, the overwhelming majority of people playing the race card have no idea what genuine, hard-core, bonafide racism is. Others, who may know, have ulterior motives (BlackYellowdogs.com).

Before we go any further, let me state for the record: America is not perfect, but neither is any other country on this planet. Perfection exists only in heaven. (If you are an atheist, you deny even that.) I had the good fortune to have been born in the U.S., and I have lived long enough to have witnessed (and experienced) firsthand the rigid segregation of the ’40s, ’50s and the civil rights movement of the ’60s. I also have had the privilege of visiting numerous countries on three continents, including the one referred to by some African-Americans as “the mother country”: Africa. As a result of these and other life experiences, in my opinion, the vast majority of people crying “racism!” and/or “discrimination!” have no earthly idea what they are talking about.

Are there racists around today? Yes, there are. However, the real, classical, bone-deep racism of yesteryear no longer exists in America as a whole, and the overwhelming majority of white Americans simply is not racist; in fact, in many cases, they bend over backward to prove that. It seems to me that if white America were as racist as the critics allege, then the “racist” label would be eagerly sought out and diligently applied by all candidates for public office. However, here is a dirty little secret: The reason the racist label is kept moistened and ready for application is because of the certainty that if it sticks, the wearer is dead in the water.

So, “whatup wid dis racist/racism stuff?” As a revolutionary (nicknamed Malcolm Z) in the ’60s, I learned some of the basic tactics of Racial Rhetoric 101 in use today: Fight facts with fertilizer, history with histrionics, and when all else fails, bring out the name calling – Whitey, Honky and Cracker. (Avoid Redneck – it’s been favorably co-opted). Racist can be used quite effectively as a modifier for conservatives, Republicans, bankers, homophobes, etc. (For effect, this is best done with a slight curl of the left side of the upper lip. Dreadlocks, or a shaved head with a fu manchu mustache, maximize impact.)

As I have said on numerous occasions, most of what is classified as racism today is something I call virtual racism. This virtual racism, which is causing such heartburn today, would have, back in the day, been hailed by rank-and-file blacks as having reached the Promised Land! In my opinion (I am still entitled to one of my own?), this virtual racism is like a video game – virtual football or virtual war games; you can get quite exercised about it, but all things being equal, it’s not likely to draw blood.

Here is just a brief refresher for those stressed out by virtual racism. Melba Pattillo Beals, one of the students who integrated Little Rock’s Central High School (who was stabbed and had acid, which could have blinded her, thrown in her face) had this to say: “My eight friends and I paid for the integration of Central High with our innocence. During those years when we desperately needed approval from our peers, we were victims of the most harsh rejection imaginable. The physical and psychological punishment we endured profoundly affected our lives. It transformed us into warriors who dared not cry, even when we suffered intolerable pain.”

And lest we forget, real (not virtual) lynchings occurred from the late 1800s into the 1950s. During that time, according to Tuskegee Institute, 4,730 lynchings took place: 3,437 blacks and 1,293 whites (mostly Republicans) (BlackYellowdogs.com).

Seems to me, the prospect of having been possibly red-lined for a loan, perhaps not being promoted, encountering an insensitive clerk in a department store or deliberately slow service in a restaurant could be an occasion for singing, “We have overcome!”

Offhand, I’d say times have changed.