Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (647778)	3/12/2012 9:42:30 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572507

Al, I'm against government paying for Viagra and other treatments for ED. If you can't get it up, pay for the damn pills yourself. Unwanted pregnancies are almost always the result of irresponsible behavior. It's one thing for government to fund said behavior (heck, they do it all the time), but it's yet another thing to force religiously-affiliated institutions to do just that. Either way, government should not be involved in preventing or reducing unwanted pregnancies, other than maybe public service announcements and educating the public. And even then, who gets to say what (e.g. abstinence-only policies) is just plain stupid. If you can't tolerate a sensible message, don't bother living in the world we live in. Tenchusatsu

To: Alighieri who wrote (647778)	3/12/2012 10:21:31 PM
From: i-node	Respond to of 1572507

>> I think this is an issue of equal access once again.. Equal access my ass. Obamacare does more to eliminate equal access to health care than any legislation in history. >> In any case If insurance companies cover the little blue pills they should also cover contraception for women There is no mandate to cover Viagra, nitwit.