Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matt C. Austin who wrote (28196)	11/23/1997 7:30:00 PM
From: knight	Respond to of 35569

Hey Matt, I like that #3. Won't take 'em long huh? btw, there's a lot of juniors trading around .50 cdn that can pick up 100k+ on financings. Check out stockwatch once in a while for the nr's. knight

To: Matt C. Austin who wrote (28196)	11/23/1997 8:34:00 PM
From: Bob Jagow	Respond to of 35569

Hang in there, Matt. Pretty much agree with your take. bj

To: Matt C. Austin who wrote (28196)	11/24/1997 9:06:00 AM
From: Proton	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Re: Our Future I hear that things are getting worse in the thread instead of better so I'll just post when I think I have something pertinent. With the exception of the observation that Wally and others are spamming, there is utterly nothing factual in your post. Numbers 1-4 are purely conjectural. "Relevance" without factual basis is not relevant. Here is a fact: IPM is not returning shareholder e-mails. Here is another fact: IPM has made no public statement since creating the FAQ web page, which was a lot heavier on the "Q" than the "A." Facts are inconvenient things. Pý p.s. memo to all: please do not refer to "that man" as CL. His name, as far as I know, is Frank Stauffer. Do not allow the "CL" charade to continue.