SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nixpix who wrote (88086)3/17/2012 3:05:33 PM
From: Amelia Carhartt  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217556
 
"Everything is lining up with what he forecasted at his seminar in Dec." What was that?



To: Nixpix who wrote (88086)3/17/2012 3:35:29 PM
From: Maurice Winn3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217556
 
When it was rumoured that Lehman Bros was going down the gurgler, it happened really quickly after that. Like traditional runs on the bank, nobody wants to be last out, so they head for the exits in a hurry when they see others sidling for the door.

I have no idea why anyone would have their money in Goldman Sachs now. They swindled a fortune out of the taxpayers to bailout AIG which returned money to Goldman Sachs. Goldman Sachs and others have enjoyed enormous financial support from taxpayers.

On the other hand, I was trying to get Globalstar going but it went bust. It was liquidated and the assets sold. Where was my umpty$billion? General Motors was going bust, but being friends of Obama, they got loads of loot. Nobody should get loot. If a company can't do it and go bust, they should transfer the assets to somebody who can do it, or at least is willing to put in a lot more money to try.

Maybe people putting money into Goldman Sachs are betting that the government will save them again. It's quite possible, but it might be that the political fallout with the public would be too great. A lot of people now think Goldman Sachs in particular could go the way of Lehman Bros and it would be no bad thing.

Hmmm... I had better check the share price of GS. finance.yahoo.com oh, it has already been halved from the glory days. And only $60 billion market capitalisation. That's small fry these days. Letting them go under wouldn't matter at all.

Flash crashes come around when the supersonic high frequency million mile a minute computers detect a hint of blood in the water, or even when they want to just test the health of a herd. Start a stampede and see who is limping. Then focus the attack there. If they smell blood in the water, they start an attack and then the rest swarm in too in a feeding frenzy.

Those million mile a minute computer systems are not investors, they are liquidity testers, fear monitors, competitors and cannibals of each other, arbitrage fillers, seeking weakness in financial stability, finding doubt in investors' minds, tidying up after regular investors have done whatever they decide to do.

No doubt they are circling Goldman Sachs now, and a lot more besides.

Mqurice



To: Nixpix who wrote (88086)3/20/2012 3:42:03 AM
From: TobagoJack1 Recommendation  Respond to of 217556
 
i think armstrong has much merit even if he is a bit non-main-stream (an advantage, imo)



To: Nixpix who wrote (88086)3/20/2012 8:25:39 PM
From: Arran Yuan  Respond to of 217556
 
I read this prediction of his. You reminded me of this as I have been busy with writing grants and establish our Master of Global Health program in the past 3 weeks.