Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pugs who wrote (21179)	11/23/1997 11:19:00 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

Pugs, Sad thing about Foreman last night. I was watching the first 5 rounds and it look like Briggs was fighting like a whipped puppy dog. I had to leave the bar I was watching it at before it ended. Truly a travesty of justice. Foreman was completely dominant in mind, body and spirit. I highly suggest that you read the GIFS thread from Jan/Feb through June. You will then see the comparisons between the alleged short position, someone orchestrating people to take delivery, the exhuberant news releases, the non-existent or grossly overvalued assets, leading to a raid of the corporate headquarters by the state of Tennesse and the fugitive flight of its CEO, Muhammed Zayed. I thought that GIFS was a soap opera until I came over here to the OVIS/RMIL story. Read it, educate yourself, and make some comparisons. You'll see what I mean. Subject 8202 Regards, Ron

To: Pugs who wrote (21179)	11/24/1997 6:05:00 AM
From: Riley G	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 55532

I would say RMIL is more like MSFT. Started small and should grow to be one of the leaders in the bottled water business.. RG -- To: Ron Reece (21141 ) From: Pugs Sunday, Nov 23 1997 11:12PM EST Reply #21179 of 21214 Ron, I've heard many do a comparative study to GIFS, but NO ONE has defined how they are related in definitive terms, as far as I'm concerned the analogy is trite and not applicable. If you can do a comparative study in definitive terms your commentary might be taken more seriously since the comparison is applied to any BBstock that some wish to slam and catagorize. thank-you for your aid, but it comes off as offensive, since we're all adults and make our own decisions on our own particular criteria(s), Pugs