SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zakrosian who wrote (477815)3/21/2012 9:59:57 AM
From: skinowski6 Recommendations  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 793927
 
>>> I've been very reluctant to even consider having a colonoscopy after that. <<<

The case you described is unusual. Clearly, there is no direct connection between being pocked around in the colon and becoming quadriplegic. Something unrelated must have happened.

Having a colonoscopy is a good idea. Most colon cancers develop out of polyps, and usually it takes the polyp many years to become cancerous. This gives a window of opportunity of several years duration to find that polyp and to snap it out with a wire. Current recommendation is to have a colonoscopy starting at 50 once every 10 years - if the results are normal and if there are no other risk factors, like family history. Many thousands of deaths are prevented this way every year. The procedure, normally, is no big deal. The smart thing is -- to have it.



To: Zakrosian who wrote (477815)3/21/2012 7:29:01 PM
From: Farmboy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 793927
 
That's not at all comforting! Was it due to the anesthetic, or the procedure itself?

But .. if she could feel pain ... then she wasn't 'paralyzed' really, right?

So .......... was the common consensus that she was faking, or that the doctor just never did anything wrong?