Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (478157)	3/23/2012 10:05:15 AM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 793983

Yes Romney's response to George Snuffalopagus was exactly how these types of bates are to be handled. The leftist press is to be denied their straw men whenever possible. But Romney's response was spot on.

To: Bill who wrote (478157)	3/23/2012 10:53:49 AM
From: MulhollandDrive	9 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793983

santorum's ridiculous statement reflects the mindset of the far right wing (most notably religious right) that he is pandering to ideologically....iow, if you cannot 'purity' test you are probably just as well off with the 'devil you know' i've seen post after post about romney not being a 'true conservative'....and yet neither are santorum or gingrich for that matter if look at their records.....and santorum PARTICULARLY with the social agenda statements is, imo calculated to prey on the fears of the RR without coming right out and stating don't vote for romney, he is 'not one of us' i.e, a mormon....he's taking a page from the palin playbook by sabotaging the likely nominee with the conservative RR 'base' so he can run in 2016 (i believe this is palin's strategy as well) so much for what is best for the country....