SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Farmboy who wrote (13460)3/23/2012 1:57:37 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
<<
Evidently they did fail to admit that even happened, in spite of all the proof to the contrary.


No they learned that the first year. It was a truism. Eveyone knows it. The scientist's have taken atmospheric chemistry light years beyond that reality.

My son in law has a PHD in atmospheric chemisty and studies global warming. He said the satellites really helped their research.

He also tells me they know. There is no disagreement between the top scientists.

Believe it or not.



To: Farmboy who wrote (13460)3/23/2012 1:57:38 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
<<
Evidently they did fail to admit that even happened, in spite of all the proof to the contrary.


No they learned that the first year. It was a truism. Eveyone knows it. The scientist's have taken atmospheric chemistry light years beyond that reality.

My son in law has a PHD in atmospheric chemisty and studies global warming. He said the satellites really helped their research.

He also tells me they know. There is no disagreement between the top scientists.

Believe it or not.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News