Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (478295)	3/23/2012 10:41:14 PM
From: goldworldnet	1 Recommendation Respond to of 793970

Peter Singer is among the worst in intellectual circles. I'm sure his evil will live on long after he's dead. * * *

To: Brumar89 who wrote (478295)	3/24/2012 7:29:55 AM
From: TideGlider	5 Recommendations Respond to of 793970

Now there is a slug. Peter Singer. He is nothing less than a hypocrite, however one must really have ethics in order to attain such heights as Hypocrisy! Here is a man who preached euthanizing victims of Alzheimer's as they have deteriorating quality of life, are not ot are less self aware and cannot fend for themselves. That is unless it becomes more personal. His mother became a victim of Alzheimer's Disease and he immediately decided euthanizing victims of the disease wasn't a really good idea. Since the elite don't elaborate on their obvious hypocrisies you must consider two possibilities for apparent change of heart. The first being that he shares some form of "love" in the rather droll sense that common humans and even animals do. Oh puh...lease! Peter is far to above the pedestrian to have such attachments to others. So we have the second, more understandable and believable reasoning. Peter may have recognized Alzheimer's may have in some cases genetic predispositions of which he could possibly carry. Okay so scratch that one, Alzheimer's is okay now. They can live, even against all little Peter's rules. I suppose the same can be said for eating meat when Peter becomes hungry and nothing else is available. Hard to imagine Peter becoming a cannibal...not really. How is it Peter is allowed to survive on publishing and promoting his stupid ideas? Surely any thinking person realizes Peter is a Runner, much like Logan in his dystopian society. Peter would demand sacrifice of all others until his name was pulled from the magic hat. Then it is time to change the rules again and again etc until little Peter dies a peaceful, natural death. That is of course barring some unforeseen accident or tragic violence perpetrated upon him by some lesser being. How is it the left are so compassionate and the right is so evil and wicked when the left enthusiastically indulges people like little Peter? I suppose it has something to do with how time stands still for the impatient youth and thoughts of personal vulnerability are extremely remote. Youth feel they are truly invulnerable. Now what of the older elitists? How do they manage to see their future without being euthanized? They are manipulators who believe they can manage YOU. How does the left preach such insensitive doctrines and project any appearance of caring for others. One day little Peter will regret his teachings and recant them. However, it may be too late for Peter as his loyal students will not allow it.