SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: 2MAR$ who wrote (23570)3/26/2012 9:05:53 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation  Respond to of 69300
 
Dawkins is afraid to debate him because he knows he'd lose.

And you've falsified the title of Dawkin's piece.



To: 2MAR$ who wrote (23570)3/27/2012 1:43:50 AM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
" Darwin's Bulldog Richard DAWKINS exposes Christian Philosopher William Lane Craig to the contempt of the entire normal human race"
guardian.co.uk

"But why take the lives of innocent children?

The terrible totality of the destruction was undoubtedly related to the prohibition of assimilation to pagan nations on Israel's part. In commanding complete destruction of the Canaanites, the Lord says, 'You shall not intermarry with them, giving your daughters to their sons, or taking their daughters for your sons, for they would turn away your sons from following me, to serve other gods' (Deut 7.3-4). […] God knew that if these Canaanite children were allowed to live, they would spell the undoing of Israel. […] Moreover, if we believe, as I do, that God's grace is extended to those who die in infancy or as small children, the death of these children was actually their salvation. We are so wedded to an earthly, naturalistic perspective that we forget that those who die are happy to quit this earth for heaven's incomparable joy.

Therefore, God does these children no wrong in taking their lives."