Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carolyn who wrote (127999)	3/29/2012 3:44:38 AM
From: MJ	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224723

Thank you for this post-----------the Democrat Congress consistently attempted to change the laws of our United States of America Constitution regarding who may run for President of the USA. It is transparent to this writer that the Democrat members of Congress were attempting to pass laws to affect the election of the President of the USA as proscribed in the Constitution without amending the Constitution of America and sending the amendment to the vote of the citizens of America. One attempt by the Democrats required that a candidate for President only live in America for 14 years, another specified 20 years. Worth noting in this brief film is that the final legislation by the Democrat controlled Congress of 2007/2008 mentions McCain having the right to run for President---------------that legislation was an unnecessary piece of legislation as McCain already had the right to run for President according to the Constitution and according to his having been born of 2 American Citizens. In other words they turned the question of Obama's citizenship to be a question about McCain's citizenship. This brief film is an excellent description of the attempts to change the Constitution to allow Barrack Obama or any other person who falls under the various categories as described in this the short film to run and be elected to POTUS. According to the film, about $1.400,000.00 was spent in 2008 in legal fees by Obama to prevent the questions surrounding whether or not he was a citizen of the USA and qualified to run for president of the USA. The Democrats all kind of possibilities in an attempt to make it legal for Obama to qualify as noted in the film. Read it and you decide. youtube.com

To: Carolyn who wrote (127999)	3/29/2012 8:21:21 AM
From: lorne	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224723

Obama jokes about his eligibility Exclusive: Floyd and Mary Beth Brown note Alinsky tactic of mock-and-accuse by Floyd and Mary Beth Brown Thursday, March 29, 2012 wnd.com We have found the presidency of Barack Obama provoking us to outrage in unexplainable ways. Does he do this on purpose? We believe he does. He and his team single out Christians and conservatives by provoking them and then mocking their response to the provocations. First, it is important to understand that one of the favorite tools of Alinskyites is mockery. They love to mock their enemies. In his primer on radical change, Saul Alinsky, the guru of the political movement most closely aligned with Obama, writes in his tactics training chapter, “Ridicule is man’s most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counteract ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, which then reacts to your advantage.” What better way to mock your enemy than to send messages that infuriate them and then mock the response as “crazy”? They have been doing this throughout the Forgery-gate scandal. The media in unison call anyone that mentions the Obama birth certificate controversy and Obama’s lack of vetting and documentation as “obsessed and loony.” But Obama himself cannot stop talking about it. This week alone, he has mentioned it in public twice. On March 20, he joked about it while meeting with the prime minister of Ireland, Enda Kenny. The assembled reporters and supporters greeted his snide comment with uproarious laughter. Also, while in Cushing, Okla., to talk energy, Obama couldn’t help but talk about his birth certificate again. He asked a woman in the crowd who was allegedly born at the same hospital as he was if she could “find her birth certificate.” We know this only because Fox News reporter Ed Henry tweeted about it. But if the president wants the issue of his birth certificate not to be in the news, why does he personally continue to talk about it? We contend he does want it in the news so that he can wield this “rules for radicals” strategy against his opponents. We first became interested in this topic back in 2008 when Floyd wrote a campaign biography of then candidate Obama entitled “Obama Unmasked.” In doing his research, Floyd was personally embarrassed because he reported the Obama birth place inaccurately in the book. The source he relied upon for his information was a website named barackobama.com. Obama’s team put the wrong information about the birthplace of their candidate on his own campaign website. The website claimed that Obama was born at Queens Hospital in Honolulu. Only after the officials at Queens claimed they had no records of his birth there was the campaign forced to change its website. Floyd’s book was already at the printer, and the error has stuck in his craw ever since that day. Over the following months, multiple documents have been released purporting to be the birth certificates of Barack Obama. The mainstream media have never done a thorough, professional analysis of any of these documents, but all of the experts that have analyzed the various documents conclude they are likely forgeries. The strongest review was done by the Cold Case Posse of law-enforcement officials empaneled by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio. The posse and the document experts they employed were unanimous in declaring the latest document a forgery. Obama’s team released this forged long-form birth certificate. Then they mock us when we ask questions about getting an authenticated document to prove his constitutional eligibility. So, because we seek truth, we are called variously, mad, crazy, daft, lunatic, insane, batty and demented. But all we have ever wanted is the truth. Is that so bad?