SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Tankwatch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zax who wrote (17944)3/29/2012 1:53:08 PM
From: sylvester80  Respond to of 32692
 
By pushing the launch button on his legal ICBMs, Jobs bequeathed a significant risk to his successors. Apple may succeed in forcing competitors to deactivate a few phone features, or maybe even yank an entire model or two from a major market. But Apple has many rivals: If one falters, others will step in. Samsung’s website lists no fewer than 134 phone models. Apple, by contrast, has only two core products at issue in the patent war: the iPhone and iPad. Unlikely as it might seem, if a competing manufacturer manages to persuade a judge or a trade commission somewhere in the world that Apple has relied on a faulty patent for something important, the Cupertino (Calif.)-based juggernaut could suffer profound reputational damage and—more important to stakeholders—market-share erosion.

This is already happening with Motorola's patent on push data that Apple has found to be violating in Germany. If this goes global, it will have profound implications for CRAPple...



To: zax who wrote (17944)3/29/2012 2:08:28 PM
From: FJB  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 32692
 
Still hard to reconcile the Jobs of, "We have always been shameless about stealing great ideas." With the Jobs that was delusional enough to think they created the iPhone and iPad form factors, or did he not really believe it himself.