To: bentway who wrote (649484 ) 3/29/2012 2:55:49 PM From: TimF 1 Recommendation Respond to of 1575659 Insuring 98% isn't 98% success. Success is lowering the cost for health care and health insurance, without lowering quality. --- “There was a significant increase in premium costs paid by workers, reflecting Massachusetts decision to put off efforts to address lowering health care costs in the 2006 legislation,’’ according Health Affairs, the journal that published an article based on the survey on its website today. ... At the same time, health care costs were an important issue for many families in Massachusetts in fall 2010. About half adults surveyed reported their family was spending more on health care in 2010 than in the prior year and a quarter were not confident in their ability to afford care in the coming year, the survey found.articles.boston.com Massachusetts has the most expensive care in the US — by A LOT. Average US family cost = $13,027. Average MA family cost = $14,723. That’s a whopping 13% more expensive than the average. From 2003 to 2009 average premium increase in the US was 34% for single employees and 41% for families. In MA the increase was 51% for singles and 49% for families. 20-50% faster than the US average… so much for Obamacare controlling costs. For small companies (under 50 employees), the average single/family premium in 2009 was $4,652/$12,041. In MA it was $5,250 (12.9% higher than US) and $14,203 (18.0% higher than the US). bbibenefits.com The expensive Massachusetts plan is not well-designed to systematically improve anyone's health. Instead, it's a superficial effort to clear the uninsured from the books and then clumsily limit further costs by discouraging care. slate.com