Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : View from the Center and Left -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cogito who wrote (186303)	3/29/2012 10:29:43 PM
From: Sam	Respond to of 542821

Their position will probably be the same as Romney's--the Federal govt is restricted from it by virtue of "enumerated powers," but states can do those sorts of mandates. At least, that is my guess. I'm not saying that they will invalidate it, just saying if they do, that could well be the line they draw.

To: Cogito who wrote (186303)	3/29/2012 10:42:48 PM
From: koan	Respond to of 542821

<<I was wondering about the upcoming SC decision on the ACA. If they decide the individual mandate is unconstitutional, will that also invalidate the state law in Massachusetts? I don't think so. That is part of that state's right stuff-lol. The right wing always wants to get down to states right's. So they can reinstitue segregation and the burning of witches.