To: Knighty Tin who wrote (131453 ) 3/30/2012 10:23:04 AM From: Freedom Fighter 2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070 >Susan Smith drowned her own children. Then, she told the police that two black men had kidnapped them. The right wing nut jobs went ballistic, which is pretty much their usual state, and got out the nooses. Susan knew the racists would buy her lie until the evidence proved it a lie. < Good story. Too bad it's an exaggeration. I watched that case. How many right wing nuts went crazy? A few dozen. We just had every every network spinning and exaggerating and dozens of athletes and celebrities foaming at the mouth enough to blow this up in an irresponsible enough way for it to spill overseas. >Today, the coroner said Trayvon had zero marks on his hands. Some beating he gave Zimm, eh? Do you really think any of this would have come out of the racist southern justice system without Sharpton and Co. raising hell? If you do, you are more terribly naive that even your notes reveal.< Like I said, I have no idea what happened, but the beating supposedly involved a broken nose and a gash behind the head from having his head pounded into the ground. That's one or two punches that may not may not produce a bruise. You have the same mental disorder as the rest of them. The default value is that it was hate crime. If that's not true, then it has to be manslaughter. If that's not true, time to crawl under a rock for a few years until the next chance to advance personal agendas. How about the default value being innocent until proven guilty? How about the default value being he told a story to the police, the police and prosecutor investigated and interviewed witnesses, examined the evidence objectively, and either concluded he was telling the truth or there was insufficient evidence for an arrest. At that stage, if the family is not satisfied, they should contact someone that will help them reopen the investigation in a responsible way.