SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lokness who wrote (14158)3/31/2012 5:37:12 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Well ya, but then how are the people with pre-existing conditions ever going to get insured?

They aren't really going to be insured under any government policy.

Paying for existing conditions isn't insurance. Insurance is pooling risk. Neither government's paying these costs, nor governments forcing insurance companies to pay these costs, nor insurance companies voluntarily incurring these costs, no health care providers providing free treatment, nor charities paying for treatment, nor people paying out of their own pocket (when that's possible) is insurance.

Any of those methods might be ways they get health care. None of them are insurance.

So you think it is liberty to not have to get insurance and instead stick it to the tax payer?

Your conflating two different things. Liberty not to have insurance, and sticking it to the tax payer.



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (14158)3/31/2012 5:47:06 PM
From: Bearcatbob2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Fixing the preconditions issue is a lot different than taking over the whole system.

FWIW - my biggest problems with Obamacare are that it is unfunded and that I fear it will result in a reduced quality of care.

My position on Health Care reform was that it was needed, it should be honestly sold, honestly priced and honestly paid for. There is absolutely nothing honest about Obamacare.

Bob