Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (128579)	4/1/2012 7:08:10 PM
From: TideGlider	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 224749

Russian's are used to getting things for nothing from Obama. Why should they pay for it? Putin would rather have another cold war. interesting though, Bill and Hillary did spend some time in the old Soviet Union.

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (128579)	4/1/2012 7:48:58 PM
From: MJ	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 224749

The most important part of that post is at the end. The whole point of the Nuclear shield between the Nato countries is to protect them to protect them from the threats that could arise from Russia. So why give control to Russia? Of course Hillary and Obama would like this to be done before the election in case Obama is not elected. Hillary has been wielding a lot of unseen power as Secretary of State--------what next will she do. "The United States and NATO have offered Russia a role in the project to create an anti-ballistic shield that includes participation by Romania, Poland, Turkey and Spain. But Moscow says it fears the system could weaken Russia by gaining the capability to shoot down the nuclear missiles it relies on as a deterrent. It wants a legally binding pledge from the United States that Russia's nuclear forces would not be targeted by the system and joint control of how it is used." reuters.com