SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve Lokness who wrote (14309)4/2/2012 12:27:13 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
The payroll taxes is only on the first 110K or so.

You didn't read very carefully, before you jump to "lies".

" I would like to see in one place where all of the Democrat "taxing of the rich" ideas are tabulated."

That wasn't phrased as a question, but it basically was one. I answered it. One of the ideas, that has been posted on this thread, in particular by Koan, and perhaps others (and other places by Democrats liberals and/or progressives), is to remove the cap.

I included the cost of removing the cap. And I said so in my post "Removing the cap on payroll taxes..."

Edit, but after all the calculations, I made a very simple math mistake. I added two simple numbers together and got a number that's too low. Don't know how I made that mistake, or missed it until now.

54.9 and 4.3% is 59.2.

Then add it the effective 4.961 for Hawaii*, and you get 64.161%

* The actual rate for Hawaii is much higher at 11% but since you can deduct that from your federal taxes, you can't just add the two tax rates to get an overall rate.



To: Steve Lokness who wrote (14309)4/2/2012 3:56:13 PM
From: Bearcatbob  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Steve - shame on you - your loony lefty friend - the one you would enjoy drinking beer with as you joked about Ron Paul - and others of his ilk want to remove the cap on SS earnings.

Bob