SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Metacomet who wrote (88721)4/3/2012 10:32:02 AM
From: Follies1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217930
 
Why would you have the bush tax cuts for bush but not for Obama when they were continued under Obama? If Obama left Bush's cuts in place as originally passed they would have expired, but that was not the case, they are now Obama's tax cuts.



To: Metacomet who wrote (88721)4/3/2012 3:28:34 PM
From: bart131 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217930
 
A different perspective, just the simple facts of raw debt growth for the last 5 presidents.




To: Metacomet who wrote (88721)4/4/2012 2:35:45 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 217930
 
Reagan's debt was for war too: wining the Cold War with a 600-ship navy. That spending the US defense establishment does not want to let go.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News