Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (480441)	4/3/2012 4:05:45 PM
From: KLP	2 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793608

Did Obama have advance word of the vote the Supremes had last week? Is this why he came out after them?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (480441)	4/3/2012 9:44:32 PM
From: Geoff Altman	2 Recommendations Respond to of 793608

For the president to imply that the only explanation for a constitutional conclusion contrary to his own would be out-of-control conservative justices does the court a disservice. Well, I suppose he could call them racists....<g> Now he's trying to play Chicago politics with the SC...... Does our radical in chief understand how our political system works (or doesn't)? I truly believe that Obama would be much happier in some other country.....

To: Brumar89 who wrote (480441)	4/3/2012 11:46:10 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	10 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793608

Obama is starting to shock old-time liberals. Ruth Marcus today and EJ Dionne on the Catholic Institutions mandate a couple of months ago. Actually, I suspect Obama did himself no favors today. Obama doesn't have much discipline when he's piqued. I think he will just put the Supreme Court's back up. He can't touch them and they can read the polls so they have no reason to fear the public. I doubt they will appreciate attempts to intimidate them.