SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (14473)4/3/2012 12:58:22 PM
From: Bearcatbob5 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 85487
 
They rule 5/4 consistently based on neo con plutocratic ideology.


Alternately they rule 4/5 based on pinko liberal wacko ideology?



To: koan who wrote (14473)4/3/2012 12:58:49 PM
From: Sdgla2 Recommendations  Respond to of 85487
 
You deny the debt Obama has run up while you boast you and yours are doing just fine.

You have zero intellectual honesty.

I love the way you toss around the word hate as well. Its not the man its his policies.

Envy, distortion and lies do not befit the office he holds.



To: koan who wrote (14473)4/3/2012 1:24:45 PM
From: Little Joe4 Recommendations  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 85487
 
Koan:

Your ignorance is astounding. The Supreme Court has been declaring laws unconstitutional since the court was founded.

"They rule 5/4 consistently based on neo con plutocratic ideology."

Or you could say based on crazy left wing liberal Idealogy.

"And the Citizens United law over turned 100 years of settled law. "

Just a liberal talking point and not true. If you think it is true, just explain what statute or case law that is 100 years old that was overruled and where I can find it.

"And they will overturn Obamacare which is also considered settled law (Commerce clause)"


You cannot cite a single case, where the court ever ruled on the question raised in the Health Care Law Case. To suggest that it is settled law is just ignorance.

lj



To: koan who wrote (14473)4/3/2012 1:29:51 PM
From: sm1th6 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
And they will continue to rule the way they want, and find the law they need to defend their decisions.

The left is far more guilty of that. You claim that the commerce clause justification of Obamacare is settled law. The case that justifies it, Wickard, was one of the most preposterous rulings ever, made by a court full of FDR appointed leftists. I suppose that wasn't partisan ideology? The mandate goes far beyond anything ruled on before, if it was settled law, the court wouldn't being hearing it.



To: koan who wrote (14473)4/4/2012 9:53:28 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 85487
 
ok here's the rub, try to follow along. when people voted for lets say an anti gay marriage law, a liberal judge jumps in and says it unconsitutional that judical activism.

with obama care 39 states attorney generals asked the USCC to look at it, that's not judicial activism. do you see the difference ?