SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TimF who wrote (14588)4/4/2012 12:48:17 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
<<Any number of odd ideas will have plenty of people supporting them, so I suppose its possible that a majority of Republicans don't believe in evolution, but if your own link is to be believed 40% of Democrats don't believe in it either.

All of which is irrelevant to the point that - "There is no contradiction or conflict between believing that evolution is the driver of the diversity and creation of new species, and being a Republican".

In fact the data you link to, if considered accurate, confirms my point, since its shows that plenty of Republicans do "believe in evolution.>>

This is where addressing complexity comes in handy. Scientist's are primarily liberals because almostyt all liberals believe in evolution. It is true many Dems don't, but they are often the poor, or conservative Dems (we have cosnrvative dems in our party) and they are aligned with the Dems as the party of the worker. And the Dems do not invoke religion in their political paltforms, like the Republicans do.

Sceintist's are not Republians because they do not respect Republican's. Period. BCB says it is becaseu they often have government jobs which is more nutsy stuff. Conservatives can get government jobs.

Scientists do not BELIEVE what conservatives believe. They believe what liberals believe. that is why so many are liberals and dems!

Now let us assume I am correct (and I am) for a change instead of just blindly attacking my post. What would that mean to a rational person?