Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (650403)	4/5/2012 12:43:05 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576660

Ted, did you even read what Obama said? He basically called the potential overturning of ObamaCare an "unprecedented step." This is easily refuted by any historian, expert in constitutional law, or even a high school student. It is? Go for it. Given that Obama is no dummy, why would he say something like that? The logical conclusion, other than being under the influence of a controlled substance, would be that he had ulterior motives for saying it. Because the Court is trying to legislate re this law. That has not been their role in the past and its not what was intended when the Court was set up. > And what about Scalia's dishonsty? LOL, nothing that Scalia said was dishonest or inappropriate in the context of judicial review and the impact thereof. Maureen Dowd is really reaching here, but that's typical of her. With you all, its always everyone is reaching; is not being fair; is prejudiced against the right. At some point, you all are going to have to start facing the truth...........that you are badly out of step with the rest of us.