Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: scion who wrote (21784)	4/5/2012 5:54:25 PM
From: old 'n cranky	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 53574

I'll gladly agree that this is true: "I believe the SEC people writing to 310/JBI, including the aptly named Mr Edgar, were well aware of the problems with Gately long before 9/28/10". But I chose my words carefully.......they weren't proffered as an opinion but as fact....and they had nothing to do with Gately, whose name does not appear in any of the relevant filings. "There is no evidence in the Edgar system of any prior correspondence from the SEC that might have triggered the May 8K." Following are representative excerpts of ALL of the SEC correspondence filed between the date of the Javaco/media credit acquisition and the 9-28-10 letter. I believe that I am providing excerpts that deal directly with the issues in the correspondence and haven't left out any details of substance, but you can certainly check me via your own list of links: 8/25/09 "We have completed our review of your Form 8-K and have no further comments at this time on the specific issues raised." 9/1/09 "As Moore is no longer registered with the PCAOB, you may not include Moore’s audit reports or consents in your filings with the Commission made on or after August 27, 2009. If Moore audited a year that you are required to include in your filings with the Commission, then you should engage a firm that is registered with the PCAOB to re-audit that year." "Please amend your Item 4.01 Form 8-K, filed August 17, 2009, to disclose that the PCAOB revoked the registration of Moore on August 27, 2009............." 9/23/09 "We note that you filed an Item 4.01 Form 8-K/A on September 3, 2009 in response to the issues raised in our letter dated September 1, 2009. Additionally, please file a response letter via EDGAR as previously requested to advise us as to how you intend to address any re-audit requirements." 10/13/09 "We have completed our review of your Form 8-K and have no further comments at this time on the specific issues raised." That's all of them.......they are the filings that I read prior to making the statement and there is no other SEC correspondence on file subsequent to the acquisition date and prior to 9/28/10. If anyone can tell me how any of those could possibly constitute "evidence in the Edgar system of any prior correspondence from the SEC that might have triggered the May 8K" I will gladly 1)apologize for dragging everyone through this process and 2) apologize to anyone who had a firm basis to disagree with my statement and whose research efforts IN THIS SPECIFIC INSTANCE I besmirched. Otherwise I'd appreciate a little more consideration for my effort to provide a factual post. My opinions may suck, but I work pretty hard on the facts before I post them. People that disagree with my facts might show their appreciation for that by carefully researching them before announcing their disagreement. Except for the apologies that I will submit, if someone can explain the facts that might make that necessary, I'm sure you agree that there is no need for me to pursue this any further. Thank you for moderating a board that allows me to go off like this :o)